Posted by on Nov 14, 2010 in Article, UFO | 102 comments

Jonathan Reed’s Hoax Alien

The Great Encounter Debate…

Updated February 14, 2014.

So this event has very little middle ground. You either find this ridiculously fake or you feel this is the closest thing to contact we have ever had. Neither is wrong, but the debate continues decades after the event happened. I personally can’t buy a word of it. I have a healthy skepticism, so unless it’s proof I can’t rip apart, I’m not buying it. I also add in, that it has to be proven to be real, not proven to be fake. There is no proof that this is real (the video footage is not definitive, not even a little), and there are no other witnesses to corroborate his experience. So please do not take offense if I am a bit… brutally honest with this.

My bottom line is this: When and if a REAL AUTHENTIC alien encounter happens like this, possibly by one man, or a small group of people, this supposed encounter by Reed / Rutter will taint the truth. The skeptics, debunkers will all point to this and laugh at them, and at us. The validity of any true encounter, or evidence has diminished because of this hoax (arguably) and so called “doctor.”

UFO Watch Dog has a lot of damning evidence against John Bradley Rutter, and come to find out, most of the personal information is incorrect. The following video has shed some light on WHO Reed / Rutter is, but it does very little to prove anything about the encounter.
NOTE: This does prove who he is and a few of the personal facts that were in dispute. I am glad a few things can be cleared up. Unfortunately does not sway anyone away from the actually video and information regarding it, which as of now has never been proven to be anything but a hoax.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zypYQkuxklk&feature=youtu.be

So where does that leave us?

I have a nice list of things that I have questions about:

  • Jonathan Reed is not his real name, in fact this is one of close to a dozen name changes before and after the event. NOTE: Some people state it is because he needed to hide his identity after his claim.
  • For someone who wants to document it, he never takes off the aliens clothes (which look like human clothes), we never see the hands, feet, legs, or any other part of the body.
  • It actually doesn’t look like there is a body in there, just some clothes in the shape of a humanoid. If this creature could rip a dog in two, a simple hit on the head deflates this creature and his strength?
  • I find it hard to believe that human blood looks very much like… alien blood.
  • The alien never moves. Not even a twitch. It blinks it’s eyes, and that is all. No movement from the flat body, no head turn, no mouth movement.
  • So the alien has enough strength to rip a dog in two, but not enough to move it’s arm or leg or head?
  • Why didn’t the “Dr” call the Police or have other people witness it?
  • Reed recorded the alien “screaming” not with a video recorder but a tape player. Reed claims it was visible and bubbly? really? No VIDEO of that?
  • While picking up the head and skull the alien did not “scream?” So just by opening the freezer door it screams but playing with a head wound… it doesn’t?
  • On Fact or Faked they had a FBI voice analysis of “Dr” Reed and he was flat out lying… about everything. This is very arguable, but still another question I would like answered.
  • He could make a lot of money from this, books, interviews, videos, etc… and has.
  • He had the cameras all ready for the aliens, but not for the mysterious vans in his driveway?
  • There is absolutely NO OTHER witnesses. Who tipped off the “mysterious vans?” Was it the costume rental company retrieving its alien mask?

Rutter changed his story. The first “story” he claimed the alien found a way out of his freezer and escaped on his own accord. So that begs to question, the alien couldn’t move a muscle when Rutter was filming it… yet the alien could open a freezer from the inside with no handle, and escape. But there is absolutely NO movement in the Alien in this video. So my theory, is that Rutter decides the first story just is not going to be feasible. So he concocts a story about mysterious vans. “Mysterious Vans” that have no real description, that show up despite no witnesses. If you were trying to cover something up, get away with a lie, what would you do?

So lets move on to the fact he calls himself a Doctor, and yet doesn’t keep samples, takes readings, no experiments and does not try to help the creature or does anything but ball it up in a freezer? Reports claim the people testing the blood and tissue samples were “murdered.” If that is true it is horrific. But after reading so many articles, there has never been any record or report of any lab technicians, scientists, lab personnel or doctors murdered in or around this time in that area of the United States.The claim was TWO, so that was very distinctive… it never happened. (please spare us the Government coverup nostalgia)

I know there are doctors who are not of medicine, but in my opinion, this video was shot by an average joe, not a highly educated individual (This is very opinionated of me, but it is something I took in account). Unless he is Doctor Love from Rock 98 – this is yet another thing that does not “jive” with his story. Why do you bother to film this creature, keep it in the freezer and you don’t want to help it? Maybe even contact someone who could do something. If this is a true story, he left it to suffer in a freezer with traumatic injuries and unrestrained. Doesn’t sound safe, and definitely does not sound humane, for anyone, let alone a highly educated doctor.

I won’t even comment on the find the hovering object; for me is not even a credible piece of evidence.

The poor dog gets forgotten in this whole account and if he really did die during this, it is a horrible event. But it has been documented that he said the dog was “tore in half” by the alien. Then the story changed, per Rutter / Reed to “the dog turned to ashes.” You either remember the account correctly or you are lying. But if you suspend disbelief for a moment, imagine trying to grab a dog and rip it in half. A decent size dog like a golden retriever. I can’t fathom a human being able to do it, so this creature went down with a hit of a stick yet had the power and agility to grab the dog and destroy him. Yet, people continue to believe without truly thinking this through.

I have read many times in regards to his career and how it affected him. “Why would he give up a blossoming career of medicine, cars, women, etc…” Reed has signed off and wrote multiple books, made a lot of money doing it. You can buy his book now if you don’t believe me. You think this is going to the Humane Society in honor of his dog? I doubt it. When you have questions and their is a motive present, you are now in the prove me wrong category. Which no one has, nor do I believe anyone will with the current evidence (with nothing new).

He has back peddled on how the alien escaped, how the dog died and what he did after he came back from gathering the creature. So let’s take the personal information out all this and lets boil it down to:

An alien encounter that has no tangible evidence.Whether you believe him or not, this is the truth.

  • Where is the body? Some vans took it away.
  • Why no blood and tissue samples? He did, but the people doing the testing were “murdered.”
  • What did you do with the dog? No one knows.
  • Where are the people corroborating his story? There is not any, and conveniently “not available” now or the time of the event. No messages to friends and no one to step forward and tell us he tried to contact him.
  • What evidence is there? A video of “something” wrapped up that blinks once. doesn’t make a sound, doesn’t move a muscle and the body looks to be grossly undersized in accordance to this creatures head.
  • So he is on the run because of these “assassins”? No, he was readily available to do an interview on a popular sci-fi show.
  • Does he have video of the autopsy? Despite being of the medical profession, psychological or not, he does not perform this. Just a quick grab of the eye lids.

Gathering all the evidence is important to me and the many comments brought to my attention many things. Thank you all for participating in this. I have updated this article to reflect some of the new found information in regards to the personal information of Reed / Rutter.

I get a lot of feedback from this article, and I am sorry if the facts and information I know punch holes in your beliefs. There is absolutely no proof Rutter / Reed had an alien in his freezer. A poorly shot, planned, acted video with a horrible alien doll is not proof, in fact it diminishes this event. Take the evidence, and it is crystal clear this guy is a career con artist and the people who want to believe so much, is a victim.

If you want to believe, I encourage you to believe. Just don’t fall victim to hoaxes. Things like this take away from a possible real encounter that should be investigated. He should be ashamed of himself.


Some good comments from below (there are ALOT of comments, just pulling out some of the good ones).

KL Says:
Reed says having put the alien in the freezer……he tries to get some sleep………..now that’s just sounds too silly……you’ve just discovered what could be the biggest discovery of all time……..and you want to go to sleep!

DaveDare says:
“In the forest the alien head and face is white.When at his house it turn to clay colour.”
Allegedly the skin reacted to our environment after long exposure. Again, if you went to all this effort to hoax you wouldn’t let something so obvious slip through to raise these obvious questions.

EricaE says:
Also, I do think it’s odd that Rutter has changed his name so many times, beginning BEFORE his alleged alien experience and that he claimed to be a doctor, but never went to college. It seems like sketchy behavior to me.

And finally, why I created this article and continue the debate. To educate how this all “should” work in the real, sane world.

JournalisticStandard (LOL) says:
It is irresponsible for you to say this was a hoax and then offer only your opinion. This is not PROVEN to be a hoax. The guy who wrote the fake howard hughes… who claimed he was interviewing him… now that is a hoax. Don’t expect to have any credibility when you definitely say something is a hoax and then just go on to speculate why you think it is a hoax.

Answer?
I have only concluded the obvious end result. What do I mean by that? First there has to be evidence that can be analyzed. There is none. I can surmise that you are assuming this video is hard evidence. If that is the case, I can show you clips of the movie E.T. and proceed to ask you to “prove this a fake.” When evidence is circumstantial, unproven and have the ability to be manipulated, it is no longer hard evidence. Without hard evidence, this is “prove to everyone this is real” not the other way around…  I don’t know why I am explaining this to the Journalistic Standard, this should be journalism 101.


VIDEO ON THE FOREST ENCOUNTER:

ENTIRE FOOTAGE OF POST FREEZER EXAMINATION:

IF YOU EVER QUESTIONED HIS SANITY:

FACT OR FAKED DEBUNK PART OF EP 9 OF SEASON 1

This is no longer available for free. Which is fine, you will have to buy the episode or have Netflix to watch it. They did not do a good job with this, but did prove how ridiculously easy it is to fake it.

OTHER LINKS AND STORIES:

An article debunking the claim.

Interview with Art Bell on Dark Matter.

UFO WATCHDOG: The complete debunking of video and the person Jonathan Reed.

If you have any further information on this, please send it to us! CONTACT US.

Updated July 10th, 2016. Corrections in grammar. Removed all the dead links, added a few more and refreshed the Youtube videos.

Was Dr. Jonathan Reed's video genuine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

comments

102 Comments

  1. 11-15-2010

    I too watched the Fact or Faked episode with this segment and had it pegged as a hoax long before Ben proclaimed him to be untruthful. I think my exact words were do ya think?? Duh my teenagers could have done a better job. And as to the fact this is a really famous encounter, neither me or my loving compainion and fellow paranormal junkie had heard of it before. And we watch quite a bit of this genre. What really put it over the edge for me was when he stated that his dead dog had burst into flames and ended up a pile of ash. That was one of the first things I wondered after hearing the “facts”. What the hell happened to the poor dog? This was not even good as a comedy so this gets nothing from me!

  2. 11-18-2010

    You should see the supporters for this guy. He has been exposed as a con artist and a fraud yet people make up reasons to believe. I feel sorry for them, I mean if and when real proof comes of other beings in this universe, this jag-off has created a “cry wolf” scenario and we will dismiss it as another hoax.

    • 3-27-2011

      The supporters of this guy are completely oblivious to the truth, and if you had checked out that video, notice that the person who posted it keeps comments pending so he can erase the ones who point out the truth. I call that denial.

    • 4-17-2012

      i actually saw this right now ………http://youtu.be/zypYQkuxklk

      • 5-30-2012

        Interesting. I have read way to many stories and articles completely telling me the opposite of what this video is showing me. Unfortunately with the internet today, every single one of these photo’s could of been doctored and faked. I still believe the whole thing was a hoax, I can’t find anything that removes it from a fact. If you want to believe it to be true that is fine, I should respect that. I appreciate your comment, thank you!

  3. 11-26-2010

    So I received a comment this morning. Not only was it rude and condescending but filled with the lollipops and rainbows the followers of John Rutter (Rutter being his real name) spew in his defense. Is this the only way they know how to communicate. What I have here is NOT some conspiracy, from legitimate sources and just a bunch of common sense.

    I was going to post the comments, but decided against it. This site is made for discussion not poop throwing. If you don’t like the article, then DEBUNK ME… prove me wrong with FACT and links and articles and whatever you have. I am half skeptic half believer… make me believe but do it like you were a HUMAN BEING.

    Bottomline is, I know they don’t have it and they won’t do it. It is all a fantasy in their head that they love living, and anything that derails them from that fairy tale… they attack. This being a good case in point.

    • 6-26-2012

      Okay…bludgeon alien, check. Carefully wrap it and refridgerate, check. Instead of worrying about other aliens coming to their comrads rescue after such a grousome ordeal, shoot sloppy video footage of head and acceptionally clean clothed body repeatedly as proof to all that this happened??!! Check! Btw to anyone believing this crap is real footage…come on, really? Disregard the poorly shot video and then when testimony does not match physical evidence, you have to know…seriously!

  4. 12-10-2010

    If this thing ripped his dog apart why is there no dog blood on the “aliens” clothes or hands???

    • 9-21-2011

      Well I think what happened is that maybe that *thing* could’ve licked the blood off and just now on Fact or Faked it shows the dogs skull AND tissue (YUCK) from the dog.. I think it is just keep on watching the video. (It creeps me out D:

    • 5-8-2012

      because it never happened

    • 7-18-2012

      He explains to the “Fact or Faked” people (the episode is on right now on Syfy), that, the remains of his dog (which he says was screaming for its life while being ripped apart) became white ash on the ground.

      My question is, once you clubbed the alien, knocking it unconscious, why wouldn’t you think to gather some of your dog’s ash to analyze or at least help prove your outrageous claim?

      I, along with all other sane humans, believe Dr. Reed is full of crap.

      • 7-18-2012

        Hah yeah I just seen that and started looking up information on the whole thing which is how I got here. It’s ridiculous how ignorant certain people could be and how even after they replicate the video, prove the guy to be a liar everybody wants to go on and say that FoF was out to get him the whole time, oh please. The minute Ben met up with Dr.Reed to interview him you could just see the nervous look on Dr. Reed’s face. As he was sitting down, while he was talking, it was gold. Especially when Ben Hansen has to shut him up real quick because he kept on nervously rambling and then he finally says “You haven’t been truthful with me.” I LOL’d. #ThatMomentWhenYouCatchALiarInTheAct

  5. 1-10-2011

    You guys do realize FoF was obliverated on youtube when they tried debunking Reed right?
    I think you debunkers are trying too hard.

    • 1-10-2011

      no not really… I think it is the “believers” that are trying to hard. At first glance you know it’s fake, it has been debunked at least by 5 different agencies, sites, shows and the fact he lied about everything in his life just backs up the story. Not to mention he was making serious bank on this and still does. So alibi, check, debunked, check, feel sorry for people who still can believe this guys crap… check.

      • 3-14-2011

        FOF debunked this and as journalist or reporters and have confirmed Reed is an idiot. 5 agencies you mention are back-up.

        • 3-18-2011

          Sorry dude, fact or faked did destroy any credibility they may have had as phoney baloney investigators of the paranormal when they decided to attack Jonathan Reed. what a bunch of dumbasses. pbbbt.

          • 3-18-2011

            I dont agree with how fact or faked went about it. I was surprised they even investigated this, it was such a horrible hoax anyways. It has been proven a fake, and “DR.REED” a con artist.

      • 9-30-2012

        Jimmy, there are thousands or millions of alien encounters worldwide, 95% of people will not tell their truth because of people like you, if you need more facts, watch his interview on (otro rollo), there must be a version translated into English on youtube or vimeo, but there they had a better investigation with testimonials of real ex employees who used to work with him and were told to deny him, ex bank agents who knew him and were told to deny him, even the last technician (the only one who wasn’t killed by the government) who performed the DNA analysis gave his testimonial, go watch it, if this still doesn’t ring a bell then there is nothing else we can do to help you. By the way, he wasn’t the only one who was attached by the AGENTS, Phillip Schneider, Bob Lazar, even the astronauts are enforced to keep the secret or “else”. (Google these • Edgar Mitchell, John E. Blaha, Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, Scott Carpenter, Gordon Cooper, John Glenn. Also, watch the disclosure project made on 2001, there you will see lots of ex government agents coming forward with their truth.

        • 3-11-2013

          i was watching youtube and came across this so call Dr reeds encounter with alien.. then i continued watching the ‘heavy breathing video’ which i thaught was shot in 1970s coz the vietnam war documentry was better.. looks to me like some kind of video from vintage XXX video quality. 1998 is not a damn far away year. video quality was good then not that that good but this video was shitty. i watched movies in VCD quality in 1990s so this video was shit.. i watched 3 or 4 videos of dr reed and my conclusion or my personal believe is its FAKE and MADEUP, it was sheer waste of time. matter of fact i GOOGLED it and came here and i am again wasting time writing about this. its a HOAX and i was in college then in 1998 and was deeply into internet so i never heard about this except today on google. i like watching UFO videos but this is so much lame and fake.

          • 3-11-2013

            Well I agree for certain reasons. My main goal of this article is that I do believe in UFO’s and aliens… but this kind of crap just takes away from the legitimacy of any other encounter.

        • 12-19-2015

          Bravo Luke. The naysayers on this site will hopefully soon find out how wrong they have been and are. Dr. Reed is a hero and far more courageous and honest than the ones who slur him without ever having met him.

    • 12-19-2015

      I totally agree that Dr. Reed is speaking the Truth and you “debunkers”, aside from claiming he doesn’t have his Phd and claiming what he is saying is a lie or a “hoax”, notwithstanding having to demean, slur and ridicule anyone who has had an “encounter”… etc… makes it crystal clear the only LIARS here are you.

  6. 2-4-2011

    A complete Joke!

    In the first one-millionth of a second I knew it was a lame fake!
    Terrible quality; pathetically constructed anatomy/stuffed dummy; Paper machete head; mind numbingly unrealistic behavior for a person whom is supposed to have discovered such an extraordinary being!
    And, who the hell breathes like that? Who??
    He is a flaky, greedy, talentless, mouth breathing fraud.

    I am embarrassed for him.

  7. 3-4-2011

    Fake by crazy man.He not adoctor.Have so many alias name…….FAKE.Ufo and and alien is true>But this Dr.video is a liar.Who see him.. punch him on his face….to teach not to lie anymore….

  8. 3-4-2011

    In the forest the alien head and face is white.When at his house it turn to clay colour .The alien live after take out from refrigerator after a night in there.this creature can live in refrigerator ?.there are not much air and it can turn to ice.This terrible Dr.makes many fault to lie.No killed dog in the video.He is so kind to kill a dog to doing this fake story…..Ha ha ha……who punch him on his face…ask me for money.

  9. 3-4-2011

    His spaceship was strange thing,and not look like ufo spaceship.Dont believe this crazy man.He is not a Dr. This crazy must go to jail for at least sixth month.He can see real ufo in there.

  10. 4-9-2011

    The man is not a liar! He has changed his name as many of his friends have been killed – the govt has expunged any records of him and he has even been shot.
    Get a life and research things before you label someone a liar!

    • 4-9-2011

      Wow… I have been reading all about this and I have to say R utter has some tall TALL tales and little to no proof. A poorly designed alien doll and some tall tales and you have hundreds of followers. This is how a cult starts!

      It just bothers me because this will affect any REAL alien proof. They will just lump it in with this nut job.

    • 4-9-2011

      A. No one was killed.
      B. You evidently have not read much about this or have been selectively reading, avoiding all the evidence against him which is staggering.
      C. I have done the research, its why I have this article up. Sending youtube videos that show nothing but Rutters video and absolutely nothing else will never be linked here…but it does prove my point that you are not researching anything. You are living out a fantasy.
      D. I ask that possibly YOU get a life and research before making such claims.

      EDITED TO SAY: I apologize for my demeanor. It was uncalled for.

      • 4-10-2011

        You won’t post any links to the other side of the story?!
        Makes me wonder where your objectivity is..

        • 4-10-2011

          Actually when I first heard about it I didn’t believe it..but after LISTENING to several witnesses, hearing the evidence, and RESEARCHING many hours of videos, articles and testimonies I have come to..so telling me I’m in a FANTASY isn’t very mature. I apologize for the ‘get a life’ comment, but one-sided. or should I say lop-sided articles like this make me furious when THERE IS actually a lot of evidence and witness testimonial and by not providing THAT LINK people can’t see the other side of the story.

          • 11-10-2011

            Really? I’m watching the fof show right now (they are kinda wack BTW) and this stuff is retarded. If you believe this your a simple-minded idiot that SHOULD waste your money and time on it. I totally agree with all the debunkers. This story is crap and was made up by a con-artist to make some money or the guy is just really mentally unstable.

          • 6-9-2012

            Instead of saying there is evidence, why not present the evidence? Look, I believe that there is life on other planets and possibly extra-dimensionally, but Reed really isn’t credible. I don’t know what alien powers would turn a dog into ash. He didn’t think to preserve the ash for possible DNA testing? He’d look a lot more authentic if he wasn’t cashing in on all this. Why not tell his story freely?

            Now about his story… You’re an alien, and you arrived at a planet where you are essentially much stronger than the planet’s humanoids. You are able to take a domestic animal of that planet (one that is sometimes reputed as ferocious) and rip his head clean off of his body.. and for some reason this dog is a vampire and turns to ash (that part is just too stupid a way to poorly write off important evidence). So here you are, powerful upon an alien world… and a much weaker humanoid can grab a stick and knock you out? Even if you are weak against physical pain (which makes no sense if you’re that strong to begin with) you should have enough speed (since you are strong against their gravity) to duck under, dodge, roll away. Heck, with that strength he could have caught the stick and snapped it in two… or even punch it to splinters. To me, that’s where that evidence becomes less credible.

            Plus, the injured alien does nothing when his injury is touched, but screams in pain for no reason? No, this story is ridiculous and it makes all other alien stories look fake as well. If anything, I’d be more likely to believe that the government made this stupid story up to give actual stories less credibility rather than the lame excuse that they’re covering it up.

            He changed his name cause people kept getting murdered? Who was murdered? And how does changing one’s name help when people can obviously find you as the crew of FoF did. If the government wanted him dead, he’d be dead. “Oh, I really fooled them by changing my last name!”

            This story is ridiculous. But maybe I’m wrong… so just show the evidence and stop saying that it exist.

            It’s one thing to keep an open-mind, but it’s another thing to keep a biased one.

    • 11-10-2011

      Retard!

  11. 4-9-2011

    Hi.
    Ive been following the Reed story for a number of years now and have always kept an open mind,Finally i watched FoF last night on syfy and was wondering did Reed ever put out a Response to the episode if so any chance of a link?

    • 4-10-2011

      That is a good question… I will try to find that out for you. I am in the middle of re writing this article. Fof had a few…assumptions and things they did to discredit them…they also did some things to open your eyes to this as well.

      Thank you for the comment and I hope you always keep an open mind when out comes to all things para normal!

      • 2-14-2014

        He has done an interview on Dark Matter. I have not listened to this YET. I just can’t bring myself to listen to an hour of this guy droning on about things we can never prove…

        He might address it there.

  12. 4-10-2011

    Being in the UK we only got to see the “Fact of Faked” episode with Dr. Reed just a few days ago.

    The “Fact or Faked” show is an interesting programme that relies heavily on whether they can recreate something or not, and strongly base their conclusions on this.
    I happen to think the Washington Big Foot case was well done……..even though the original video of the “Big foot ” running did look like a man running in an ape suit all along.

    With the Reed case, some Reed supporters have questioned the honesty of the show by saying the 3 investigating the case never actually made the “alien” and the “floating black ship” themselves………but to me this diverts away from the main issue.
    Was Reed lying or fantasising his story.

    I do wish we could have seen more of the fact or faked interview with Reed as it was clearly edited down.
    If I was the interviewer there would be certainly some questions that I would bring up.

    Firstly the video camera and stills camera…….why did Reed take both out with him……unless he was expecting to see something unusual that day.
    Is there any video footage taken before the “encounter”……If not why not.

    Reed talks of his dog being “turned into ash”……..but he takes no footage of the remains of his dog…….why not.
    The audio on the video depicts heavy breathing……..but no emotions regarding the death of his dog.,

    We are also expected to believe that an “alien” that was capable of ripping his dogs jaw and turning it into ash…….was not capable of detecting Reed and his stick!
    Let’s face it Reed doesn’t look like a ninja!

    Having seen what this “alien” was capable of, Reed doesn’t seem to have any qualms about taking the “Alien” home……or examining it with nothing put a pair of thin rubber gloves!

    Reed says having put the alien in the freezer……he tries to get some sleep………..now that’s just sounds too silly……you’ve just discovered what could be the biggest discovery of all time……..and you want to go to sleep!

    Reed claims he tried to contact about 3 friends but they were all out at the time.
    But surely if you have such an encounter and have such incredible proof in your freezer…….then surely you would tell your folks and family about it……knowing that you could readily invite then to see for themselves what you have in the freezer.

    Dr Reed claims that some of his colleagues have been killed……..but how then is it that Reed has manage to survive this long.
    The supporters of the story will probably say that it would look too suspicious if Reed died……….but that doesn’t really cut it since Reed
    remained alive even before he got his story out to the public.

    Too much of Reed’s story screams hoax…….regardless of what opinion you have of the “fact or faked” investigation.

    • 7-31-2012

      What can a man not have a hobby? Like photography?

  13. 4-13-2011

    I think if you just listen to the story as told by Jonathan whoever it totally falls apart. I mean an alien come down and is doing some sort of field work and a dog takes him out. Remember there are a lot of accounts of people being basically paralyzed unable to move of their own accord, etc by these guys. I would think it only reasonable to assume an advanced being capable of traversing deep space would be able to fend off a dog with little or no harm to either one of them. That is just the first part of the story – need I go on?

    • 2-14-2014

      Rick, I imagine you can surmise that the alien was doing field work, but there really is no reason for an alien to be in a typical forest on a typical day. If this alien was doing field work, then I can’t believe he was violent or aggressive.

  14. 5-6-2011

    Why was the alien out of it’s vessel? Was it taking a piss in the woods when the dog happened upon it, and it was so scared it ripped it I half and turned it to ash? If it were defecating or something, maybe.

    • 2-14-2014

      I literally laughed out loud to this…

  15. 7-17-2011

    Dear JimmyZ, I will happily take on the role of one of Dr. Reed/Rutte’s delusional followers. You do not need to feel sorry for me, I am quite happy with my conclusions.

    I have not seen any alien related case that even comes close to this alleged fabricated story. In my opinion the US Government has obviously won with this one. Even great believers find it hard to digest all the of alleged facts and come to any rational conclusions. As soon as you mention ‘he was walking in the park with his dog’ 99% of the world switches off. And rightly so, it sounds like a load of bullshit as soon as it leaves my mouth… BUT, that doesn’t negate the fact that this case is most likely authentic.

    I was just 16 in 1996, and let me remind you all that technology SUCKED. Perhaps if the internet was a mature as today the case would have been dealt with completely differently. While today I’m a professional designer /developer in 1996 you could barely load a picture off a floppy disc.

    I know for a FACT that Jonathan Reed has been near-bankrupted ever since he went public. He GENUINELY has been trying to raise awareness about the case with no financial gains in mind. So, this leads me to the only possible reason for him to fabricate an event like this.. fame/attention. You are all in a unique position to be able to youtube and hear all about his tale in the 15(!!!)years since the case. He wishes he never opened pandora’s box.

    Fact or Faked really screwed things up for the debunkers, they should have just left the case alone. Reason being, it all comes back to the evidence, which in my opinion was pretty spectacular for it’s time. I have always been waiting for a debunker to get off their ass and show how easy it is to create an alien dummy and fake spaceship etc.. FoF took on the evidence and tried to recreate it with modern effects and a decent budget, yet 15 years later. You cannot compare the two. Hence, people need to start to comprehend that this case was most likely real. I’m sorry if you feel more comfortable classifying me as delusional.

    If you were going to make a hoax, KISS, Keep It Simple Simon! You do not make it overly complicated. Saying you had a video of an alien in the woods alone and you ran and came home would be far more easier.

    If Jonathan Reed/Rutter’s goal was fame and was this good a script writer and special effects guru, he could have released all the footage and ‘evidence’, fooled the world for a few weeks and then announce that he did it but wants to make a film. He’d get investment within hours. Wake up people. 15 years is too long to dedicate to anything that has only brought you fear and ridicule.

    I’m now going to plow through any questions raised above and give you my take on the answers.

    • No blood on aliens hands – good point. Although dog turned to powder and most likely blood too. This is literally the only bit of the case I don’t understand, but I file it under ‘why the hell would you make that shit up if you want people to believe your hoax’

    • The 5 different agency debunking sites.. um seriously my friend you may not want to believe all you read on the internet. Some have links to government. Bearing in mind the Pentagon LOST $1.3Tillion and life just goes on.. they can afford to hire a room full of 1000 people using our consumer internet to change opinion. Sounds far fetched because it doesn’t seem ‘right’ but don’t close your mind to it. Also, I know for a fact that one of the statements was by a UFO ‘expert that nobody had ever heard of and eventually had ulterior motive.

    • “Terrible quality; pathetically constructed anatomy/stuffed dummy; Paper machete head; mind numbingly unrealistic behavior for a person whom is supposed to have discovered such an extraordinary being! And, who the hell breathes like that? Who??” video was from 1996 tech… ‘dummy’ you probably haven’t seen the HiRes photos of it. I have not seen anything like it before for detail and non-hollywoodisation (if that is a word 🙂 . Heavy breathing like that is very hard to imitate without going through something very traumatic. FoF’d proved it. I have seen a much higher quality version of the video that isn’t available on the internet and you can actually see it’s pupil tracking Jonathan around the room while it blinks. It gargles when it’s neck was twisted. Red eye effect on the photos etc..

    •”Fake by crazy man.He not adoctor.Have so many alias name…….FAKE.Ufo and and alien is true>But this Dr.video is a liar.” The fact he used a fake name does not surprise me one bit. He has proven most of the details behind this white-lie in other videos. The debunkers have jumped all over this fact, but it really isn’t that incredible. WTF, Angelina Jolie is really Angelina Voight??!?? Her career never happened!!!

    •  “In the forest the alien head and face is white.When at his house it turn to clay colour.”
    Allegedly the skin reacted to our environment after long exposure. Again, if you went to all this effort to hoax you wouldn’t let something so obvious slip through to raise these obvious questions.

    •”The alien live after take out from refrigerator after a night in there.this creature can live in refrigerator ?.there are not much air and it can turn to ice.” He originally thought it was dead. It turns out it allegedly liked the dark/cold place and returned there on it’s own accord.

    • “His spaceship was strange thing,and not look like ufo spaceship.” The ‘oblisque’ as he called it really fascinates me with the case. It’s often forgotten. It was not CGI. There are photos from every angle. Design in 1996 sucked, and it is near timeless looking. It’s also completely unheard of, why make the story MORE unbelievable???

    • “This is how a cult starts!” I don’t think a lot of people really can comprehend the scale of what we’re talking about. In the next 10 years everyone is going to have seen HD footage of aliens. It’s how the world’s religions react that is going to be most important. And the regulation of their technology, which clearly at the moment is going 100% in USA’s direction.

    •A. No one was killed.
    Not true I’m afraid. What facts are you basing this statement on?
    B. You evidently have not read much about this or have been selectively reading, avoiding all the evidence against him which is staggering.
    I personally have read everything, on both sides.. many times.
    C. I have done the research, its why I have this article up. Sending youtube videos that show nothing but Rutters video and absolutely nothing else will never be linked here…but it does prove my point that you are not researching anything. You are living out a fantasy.
    I argue that I have possibly done more research than you, not just relying on information available on the internet.
    D. I ask that possibly YOU get a life and research before you make yourself look like a tool.
    All I ask if for you to be a little more openminded, in that you are at least 50% believer, and should not ridicule people who are the same and are just looking for the truth.

    • 9-16-2011

      who has the bracelit? and whats it about

    • 11-10-2011

      Really dude?

    • 5-30-2012

      I have no dog in this fight but I have to say that I was also sixteen in 1996 and technology was not as terrible as DaveDare states. I certainly wasn’t using floppy discs in 1996.
      Also, I do think it’s odd that Rutter has changed his name so many times, beginning BEFORE his alleged alien experience and that he claimed to be a doctor, but never went to college. It seems like sketchy behavior to me.
      Even though I disagree with the believers I am not going to tell them they need to get a life. Nor will I call anyone a tool simply because we have different opinions.

      • 5-30-2012

        That is a great comment. Thank you. I just have a hard time when people take everything he said for the gospel truth. It is like they just want to hear what they want to hear and that is all… I have no quams, if you feel this in some way really happened, fine, but there are 20+ facts that are wrong to say this happened 100%.

        Again thank you so much for a great comment!

        • 6-2-2013

          I don’t get it. I gave you a massive bunch of answers to your questions. I come back months later and you’re whining about how all of Reed’s delusional believers are trying to question your assumptions.

          It’s because we all need to get off our high horses and except that this story is pretty 50/50. I sit on that fence leaning towards it being real. You have dug yourself in a hole way past said fence. It’s a shame this article has become so well ranked on Google. You should view this as a privilege and just encourage the debate in your comments without ridiculing those who disagree with you.

          You are a human being like the rest of us.. it’s OK to be wrong! We all thought the world was flat once… or that the Sun revolves around the Earth. Somethings stay 50/50 for a long long time.

          • 2-14-2014

            DaveDare, I appreciate your comments. I do not agree with the validity of them, but I do respect and appreciate the time you put into this. We can respectfully agree to disagree.

            And I just bought a computer with 2 TERABYTE drive..? What? My Zip disks (I still have) were 250MB and HOLY CRAP that was a ton of space!

      • 6-2-2013

        Ha you got me Erica!

        OK to be technical, in 1996 I didn’t own a computer, mobile phone or camera/videocamera. ZIPDISK all the way back then… 100 megs used to seem infinite!

  16. 8-31-2011

    What a joke! Does he sell timeshare part time or is it timeshare in space?

  17. 10-27-2011

    This guy must have been in drugs to come up with a scheme like this. He just happened to have all that gold foil to wrap up this so called alien in. And then brings it into his house, doesn’t call authorities, and then starts picking at the face.Looks like it was made out of clay. On the actual video when he was in the woods. The supposedly dead alien blinked its eye. How could he do such a hoax like this? He must have something terribly wrong in his brain. Whatever happened to this moron?

  18. 10-31-2011

    the people on here making claim like someone said he didnt say anyone about his dog on video and every other claim has not watched or listened to the video he does morn his dog u idiots listen and every false claim i read has been explaind every one

    • 10-31-2011

      errr he is allergic to dogs AND he never owned one… so the whole premise that the alien killed “HIS” Dog is one big fat lie. DUH.

  19. 11-6-2011

    the guy saw Alien Autopsy on FOX in 1995 and tried to do his own, thats why he tries to rip the eyelid off the alien, he’s copying the TV special but he has less budget hence the ‘gym sock’ body stuffed with cotton. (no skeleton in that puppet body, but a broken skull?).

    • 3-11-2015

      That’s a crerkacjack answer to an interesting question

  20. 11-10-2011

    I just watched the Fact or Faked show with this story on it. I had seen it some time ago but decided to see if I could find a bit more info.
    I am no video expert, no doctor, just a regular person. The video looks totally fake to me, and the story even more unbelievable. What was he video taping before the alien decided to shred his dog? I would not turn on a camera before searching for my dog that is crying out in pain.
    If I ran across an alien, knocked it out and took it home…I would have called everyone I know. My friends would have all wanted pictures with it and I would have a stack of photos showing all parts of the thing. There would be a ton of witnesses even before calling the cops and the news.

    • 11-10-2011

      Forgot something. Even though there is no doubt in my mind that this is not real, I do disagree with the mindset that FoF seems to have with if you can recreate it, it must be fake. They recreate war in the movies, and that is real.

      • 7-18-2012

        They don’t have that mindset necessarily which is why a lot of the times even though they recreate things they do their own investigating afterwards. Like sometimes when they recreate images or videos of “ghosts” they still investigate the place the alleged “ghosts” were spotted for paranormal activity. They’ve admitted it themselves that just because they can imitate and recreate what ever cases they may have it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s fake.

      • 6-2-2013

        I think what was worrying was trying to cover a case with so much detail in a 15 minute segment. For example.. if they’re going to debunk recreating the eyes.. it has to be like for like. I counted 12 eye blinks in under a minute on the original.

        • 6-2-2013

          Yes I can count JimmyZ 🙂

  21. 2-24-2012

    Having spent over 30 years working for one of the government agencies that supposedly covers these things up, I can categorically say that one of the best questions that you can ask yourself when wondering whether something is genuine or not ….is ….Are they making money out of this? Are they writing a book? Are they selling their stories? Are they making television appearances? Requesting money for research?

    If the answer is “Yes” to any of the above, then you can immediately discredit them as con artists. The people who genuinely believe that they have seen something do not attempt to make money from other believers.

  22. 3-14-2012

    The people here clearly haven’t researched this thoroughly. For a
    video filmed in 1996, the alien’s features are too realistic to be puppetry. Its eyes blink,
    the eyeris move, the muscles in the face move realistically, and it moves its head
    fluidly. Even Spielberg’s Light & Magic Studio was dumbstruck
    by the realism. They said that if it was a hoax, they wanted to hire
    person responsible immediately. That was in 1996. I think the experts know better
    than you armchair skeptics. A video of Light & Magic’s response can
    be easily found on the internet.

    • 2-14-2014

      Good name for you. I apologize for poking fun, but no one was “dumbstruck” over this. His eye moved / lid closed. His mouth, cheeks and jaw did NOTHING. Unless you are watching the wrong video, you could not be more wrong and could not have told a taller tale.

  23. 3-21-2012

    I agree with some stuff, but with this and the last video I seen in his teletranportation this one look really feak, because in this time we’re avaible to make video in very good resolution but he choose the worth tecnology, and you saw this video you could think that him use this way to recording because he can hide behind his bad recording method the especial efects. Why he not use high definition cameras? why he not recording in long shoot?

  24. 4-1-2012

    Just a thought and I’m nobody in the field of UFO’s, hauntings are more my thing, but you have to approach all these situations with common sense. Lets start with these assumptions:

    1. You are out in the woods
    2. You see a strange creature tear your dog in half
    3. You beat it over the head
    4. You take it home
    5. You conduct your own examination

    With fact number 2, we know the creature is violent. Why then when you take it out of the freezer or when it blinks during the examination.. would you not pulverize it with a sledgehammer? I personally would not want to take anything that could rip a dog in half into my house.

    • 2-14-2014

      Good points. The story has changed again that the dog was not torn in half, it now has turned to ash when it encountered the alien.

      If this was a violent alien, I am pretty damn sure he would of caused much more fuss getting out of the freezer, while being examined and I am not sure a “stick” would of done anything.

      Imagine trying to grab a dog and rip it in half. A decent size dog like a golden retriever. I can’t fathom a human doing it, so this creature went down with a hit of a stick yet had the power and agility to grab the dog and destroy him.

      The more I talk about it, the more I LOL at it. Sorry.

  25. 5-8-2012

    Just watched the Fact or Faked episode on this today. As soon as Reed/Rutter started talking I thought “Liar”. I know my opinion doesn’t prove anything, of course, since it’s not based on science or research. There was just something very off about his facial expressions.

    For those who want to discredit the Fact of Faked lie detector just because it wasn’t a polygraph, you should really look into voice analysis more. It’s not 100 percent accurate, but it can tell you if there is an unnatural level of tension/stress in someone’s speaking voice. You need a sample to base it off, though, much like when they ask you test questions in the beginning of a polygraph test.

    I’m not a big fan of Fact or Faked, simply because they run a lot of stupid tests to fill up time, but I wouldn’t discredit them based on their voice stress analysis.

    • 9-11-2012

      Look at the comment I made below… the device is 46 to 62% accurate… now… do you really want something like that to prove if someone is lying or telling the truth? I know I wouldn’t… its basically a flip of a coin… Using one of those things would be the same thing as taking a coin into a courtroom and flipping it to decide whether or not the person is guilty, its not creditable and should really be tweaked and enhanced more to get more accurate readings.. I would use those kinds of things in a courtroom if it had at least an 80% accuracy rating.

  26. 7-7-2012

    Where did the alleged alien/puppet ultimately wind up? Where is the alleged teleportation device/novelty wristband today? Where are the results of the alleged tissue samples, it would be simple to ascertain what type of dna it is. Why not do a high definition film demonstration of the bracelet in front of a panel of certified scientists, it would once and for all prove or disprove the authenticity of the whole thing, right up to now it has the distinct stench of hoax, especially in view of the large pecuniary gain rutter has derived from it. Make me believe.

  27. 8-12-2012

    He is a fraud.

  28. 8-31-2012

    If you think any human with a PhD would lie, and create a massive, not to mention publicly announced ordeal, just to create evidence of alien life, you’re obviously an uneducated individual who more than likely only read about this case on this website, which provides hollow, and non descriptive “facts” to make a pathetic attempt to debunk this case. Open your minds up. I bet most of you also think that the government runs america. Lol. Is it scary? Sure. But you have to accept the fact that this happened. Educate yourselves on the full aspects of a case before you jump to conclusions.

  29. 9-11-2012

    Now, I read the comments. Saw the video, and basically im playing devil’s advocate here… Now, while I do agree this video is a fraud… I have doubts within myself to say it to this guy’s face… reason being… with technology being the way it is today anyone with simple software can make anything look real, and therefore makes people believe it was fake… Come on, if you were to show Independence day to people in 1930… they would believe it happened. So I think now a days people can’t really distinguish real from fake.

    I also don’t think people should use the Fact or Faked show to prove their point that it is fake… cause this just makes their credibility equal if not less to believers of this. The show has been disproved on a lot of their video investigations, such as the paulding lights episode I believe.. A group of Michigan college students did some of the exact same experiments as they did, but used a telescope, and they found that there was reflections of lights from cars and emergency vehicles on a reflective sign… So their credibility as investigators is under question as well.

    Now with this whole him lying scenario.. I don’t buy the use of Voice Analysis software at all… Especially commercial devices which is what the show, and a lot of other radio personalities and others would have access to, to tell whether or not he lied. First of all, in a Homeland security article they say that the prediction accuracy on this stuff is 46 to 62 percent here is the article: http://www.hsaj.org/?special:fullarticle=0.4.1

    Now let’s just put that somewhere in the middle… about 52% of the time its accurate… The V.A.S. is basically a flip of the coin in terms of commercial software… Even doing research on how these things work… they base their results in changes in voice tone for underlying emotional stress, and anger… Now I don’t know if anyone actually watched the video… but the Host ( the former FBI agent ) basically flats out calls this guy a liar and a scam artist… now if you were telling the truth, and someone said that to you… wouldn’t that ruffle your feathers and get you mad causing an emotional tone pitch change? I think it would…

    This Brings me to my next point Ben Hansen, the host of the show, and “former FBI agent”. Now with the lure of the show and the words FBI agent… you think this guy would be one of those men in black types… or at least that is what they make you perceive on the show… but Truth is folks he was a criminal investigator for the FBI, only for 6 years… He interrogated criminals and put clue’s together on a real ( not paranormal ) crime scene… so this guy really has no credibility as a paranormal investigator at all…

    So, playing devil’s advocate here… do you really think we as a society can really tell what is real and what is fact… just based on what I said? I think the answer is pretty clear you can’t, and using software that has the accuracy of the flip of a coin, combined with a guy who used to interrogate criminals… I think no side wins in this debate… and it still remains.. debatable.. Thanks for reading, hope I opened your minds up to more ideas 🙂

  30. 9-11-2012

    I would also like to point out the Black Vans taking the creature away… Now, Someone said who tipped those guy’s off… Well If you think about it… no one has to tip them off… Why is that? I mean just look at Google Maps… If a Commercial and Public company can get images of peoples houses and what’s in their back yard and around them… Why can’t the government pay for something more advanced and have it floating in orbit where there are hundreds of satellites in orbit… about 560 active satellites to be exact.. and that’s coming from the US Space Surveillance Network that report to NASA on satellites movements in space…. so what is it to say one of these 500 something satellites can’t pick up weird activity such as an alien landing or a guy hauling and killing an alien to his house? Hope this makes you guys open your eyes more as well 🙂

  31. 9-30-2012

    We already know he is a liar, Jonathan Reed is not his real name, in fact this is one of close to a dozen name changes before and after the event. (OF COURSE HE HAD TO CHANGE HIS NAME, AND HIS NOT THE ONLY ONE, HENRY DEACON ALSO DID THAT AND MANY PEOPLE WHO ARE PROSECUTED BY THE GOVERNMENT WOULD DO THE SAME, AND YOU TOO, WOULD’T YOU?)
    .For someone who wants to document it, he never takes off the aliens clothes (which look like human clothes), we never see the hands, feet, legs, or any other part of the body. (ONLY A PROFESSIONAL ALIEN ENCOUNTER WILL DO EVERYTHING HE NEEDS TO KEEP THE MILLIONS OF SKEPTICS HAPPY), THIS WAS HIS FIRST TIME WITH THIS EXPERIENCE AND HE DID A GREAT JOB)
    It actually doesn’t look like there is a body in there, just some clothes in the shape of a humanoid. If this creature could rip a dog in two, a simple hit on the head deflates thE creature and his strength?
    DEAR GOD, WHAT IS YOUR EXPERIENCE TO TELL HOW LIFE MUST EVOLVED ON OTHER PLANETS?

    I find it hard to believe that human blood looks very much like… alien blood.
    WHY NOT? IN ORDER FOR A PLANET TO SUSTAIN LIFE IT MUST HAVE THE SAME OR SIMILAR ATTRIBUTES, THEY MAY VARY A LITTLE IN SHAPE, SIZE BUT MOST OF OUR ANIMALS HAVE RED BLOOD, WHY CAN’T THEY? BECAUSE MOVIE PREDATORS DICTATES SO?

    The alien never moves. Not even a twitch. It blinks it’s eyes, and that is all. No movement from the flat body, no head turn, no mouth movement. So the alien has enough strength to rip a dog in two, but not enough to move it’s arm or leg or head?
    HE WAS UNCONSCIOUS, EVEN AN UNCONSCIOUS GORILLA WHO CAN RIP YOU APART WOULD NOT MOVE.

    Why didn’t the “Dr” call the Police or have other people witness it?
    HE DID CALL AUTHORITIES AND THIS IS WHERE HE GOT IN TROUBLE, BECAUSE THEY CAME FOR ALL THE EVIDENCE AND WHAT YOU SEE IS ALL HE COULD HAVE SAVED, 10 OUR 20 WITNESSES DIED (KILLED OR SERIOUSLY INSURED) FOR LACK OF COOPERATION SINCE THEY WANTED EVERYTHING, HOWEVER THEY TOOK 90% OF WHAT WAS RECORDED.

    Reed recorded the alien “screaming” not with a video recorder but a tape player. Reed claims it was visible and bubbly? really? No VIDEO of that?
    SEE ABOVE

    While picking up the head and skull the alien did not “scream?” So just by opening the freezer door it screams but playing with a head wound… it doesn’t?
    YES AND YOU CAN DO MUCH MORE WHEN YOU ARE CONSCIOUS.

    On Fact or Faked they had a FBI voice analysis of “Dr” Reed and he was flat out lying… about everything. This is very arguable, but still another question I would like answered.
    He could make a lot of money from this, books, interviews, videos, etc.
    He had the cameras all ready for the aliens, but not for the mysterious vans in his driveway?
    YES THAT SHOW STICKS, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zypYQkuxklk&feature=youtu.be

    HE HAS MADE 1% OF WHAT HE LOST, HE INVESTED HIS LIFE, TIME AND DIGNITY TO ALERT US, WARN US, WAKE US UP AND EVE IF HE WAS RICH AT THIS POINT, IT WASN’T WORTH IT FOR ALL THE TRAGEDIES HE WENT THROUGH. NOW MAKING VIDEOS, BOOKS COSTS MONEY, HOW DO YOU LIVE AND PAY FOR YOUR BILLS IF YOU HAVE TO MAKE NO MONEY OUT OF IT?

    There is absolutely NO OTHER witnesses. Who tipped off the “mysterious vans?” Was it the costume rental company retrieving its alien mask?
    BUT IN THE SHOW (OTRO ROLLO) MADE IN MEXICO IT HAS WITNESSES FROM THE BANK EX EMPLOYEES, UNIVERSITY WHERE HE USED TO STUDY (HIS RECORDS WERE ELIMINATED), EX EMPLOYEES, EVEN THE ONLY DNA TECHNICIAN WHO SURVIVED THE ASSASSINATIONS. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_c27AYbbqw

    • 1-12-2013

      YOU ARE SOOO RIGHT THEREMAN, IF HE FAKED THIS HE REALLY FAKED OUT THE GOV CAUSE THEY ONLY TRASH YOUR EXISTANCE IF YOU GET TO CLOSE TO THE TRUTH, OR DOESN’T ANYBODY REMEMBER BOB LAZAR? THEY TRASHED HIM TOO. THEY DON’T DESTROY FAKING PPLS LIVES JUST THE REAL ONES.

      • 2-14-2014

        Can you NOT write in all caps please?

    • 2-14-2014

      I appreciate your response. It was well thought out and holds merit. I do not agree with you, but I can appreciate your position. Thank you!

  32. 1-12-2013

    If this is a fake, WHY WOULD THE GOVERNMENT ATTACK HIM SO MUCH? THEY ONLY DO THAT IF YOU ARE GETTING TOO CLOSE TO THE TRUTH. BUT I GUESS HE FAKED THEM OUT TOO HUH? AND IF THIS IS FAKE, DR REED DESERVES A TRIPLE OSCAR FOR HIS ACTING ON THE VIDEO THE MOST REALISTIC ALIEN BODY I’VE EVER SEEN, AND ALSO THE MAGIC TRICKS OF USING THE LINKBAND AND ALSO FOR HYPNOTISM AND MAKING ALL THE OTHERS AROUND HIM BE ABLE TO SEE FREDDY COME AND GO INTO OUR DIMENSION, THEN IG UES DR STEVEN GREER IS FAKED AS WELL HUH? OH BUT I FORGOT TO TELL YOU, HE HAS THOUSANDS OF PPL THAT ACTUALLY WORKED ON THESE THINGS AND SAW THEIR PPL. THEY AR HERE PPL THIS UNIVERSE IS JUST LIKE STAR WARS OR STAR TREK THOUSANDS OF LIFE FORMS ALL OVER THE UNIVERSE GOD WOULD NOT MAKE ONE MEASLY PLANET OUT OF THE WHOLE UNIVERSE WITH LIFE WHAT A WASTE OF HIS POWER THAT WOULD BE. AND IF HE HAS ONLY US TO WORSHIP HIM WHY NOT THEN HAVE BILLIONS OF SPECIES TO WORSHIP HIM AS WELL. SO KEEP THINKING WE ARE THE ONLY LITTLE GRAIN OF SAND IN THE UNIVERSE.

    • 8-16-2013

      Jesus, anyone who writes in full caps.. I just completely ignore everything you say. 🙂

    • 2-14-2014

      I have to agree with the all caps. I do not by any means think we are alone in the universe, just the opposite. It is very ignorant to think otherwise (sorry if I offend). But issues with this “encounter” are so many and so blatant, that it makes this who ordeal ludicrous.

      And by the way, which “God” are you talking about? Seems kind of single minded to be speaking for just one God.

  33. 1-18-2013

    You are a dis info agent of the government. Sorry this man is not a fraud. The gov will change your history, but watch the updated Dr reed story on you tube, where his bankers were interviewed, and a retired military man says he saw a teleportation. I also saw his desk and other pictures which disprove the gov disinfo campaign. The “hoax” is too sophisticated to be a hoax. Sorry I believe its real

  34. 4-14-2013

    Check out Deadline27’s video on YouTube where he completely debunks one of Reeds videos beyond the shadow of any doubt… http://youtu.be/F2XTV3kJE8M

  35. 9-19-2013

    For anyone interested (whether you believe it to be a hoax or not), Art Bell interviewed him last night on his new show Dark Matter. Click here to listen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v_Ie0rQYMo.

    • 2-14-2014

      Thank you! I have added it to the article!

  36. 10-14-2013

    It is irresponsible for you to say this was a hoax and then offer only your opinion. This is not PROVEN to be a hoax. The guy who wrote the fake howard hughes…who claimed he was interviewing him…now that is a hoax. Don’t expect to have any credibility when you definitely say something is a hoax and then just go on to speculate why you think it is a hoax.

    • 10-14-2013

      First there has to be proof to be analyzed. There is none. So in reality,something like this is to be PROVEN it is real. Which in no way has it been proven real. So you are assuming this is hard evidence. If that is the case, I can show you clips of the movie E.T. and tell me to prove me wrong this is evidence. See what I mean? Without hard evidence, this is “prove to everyone this is real” not the other way around… I have only concluded the obvious end result.

      Good Day

  37. 2-14-2014

    I’m a skeptical optimist, & whilst I DO believe in many things, this is a hoax. I understand why many keep believing, as it’s hard to say that you’ve been fooled, but please check out the MASSIVE article on ufowatchdog – this site genuinely tries to separate the wheat from the chaff.
    Peace to all, & I sincerely hope that Jonathan Rutter comes clean, as such hoaxes tend to diminish the legitimacy of genuinely peculiar occurrences.

  38. 4-16-2014

    he was a fake clearly a doctor would never just film the top part of something he never seen. the dog being forgotten just like that he not crying. your dog died and you possibly killed a alien, and all you do his off and poof gasping for air where the sobing where the omg it a fake right there his emotions aren’t even genuine in the video. i can go on poking holes in the video all day but tell me one thing if any of you who commented have pets, am sure you won’t just forget or change how your beloved pet you see as family. I say this locally this is a hoax 100%

  39. 12-3-2014

    I drop a leave a response when I like a article on a site or if
    I have something to contribute to the discussion. It’s triggered by the fire communicated
    in the article I browsed. And on this article Dr.
    Jonathan Reed’s hoax alien video and story Revised.
    I was actually moved enough to write a comment :
    -) I actually do have a few questions for you if you don’t mind.
    Could it be only me or does it appear like a few of these
    comments come across like left by brain dead individuals?
    😛 And, if you are posting on other online sites, I would like to keep up with you.
    Could you make a list the complete urls of your
    social pages like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?

  40. 1-4-2016

    I don’t if this story is true, but the skeptics say a lot of things in here that are just stupid. I wish there were more intelligent and thoughtful skeptics so that this whole conversation could be more efficient and lead to some accuracy. For instance, one commenter complains that the video doesn’t have any sounds of the dog? Well that’s a no brainer, because the dog was probably dead at that point, especially if the alien applied any weapon of electricity to fry the dog. (these weapons have been reported by other humans who have come in contact with aliens, such as Phil Schneider. But I’m sure these unintelligent skeptics probably think he is a hoax too? The other comment that some imbecile left was a question as to why the alien was standing outside of the module. Well if you study ET phenomenon you know that intelligent life (not us by the way) but those that are capable of traversing space/time to come here, do a lot of research on our planet. Both geological and biological research. So the fact that the being was outside his craft is not abnormal. Anyway, I have no idea if Jonathan’s story is true, but man I sure can’t stand all the dumb skeptics that diminish a worthy conversation about the story. Even some of the questions posed by the author of this website shows signs of stupidity. The one question that did grab me was about his dog. Why didn’t he take his dog’s body back home. No way he would bring home a dead alien, but not his dead dog. That is a legitimate question. But if in fact the alien possessed technological weapons to electrify the dog and dissolve its matter, than that is one potential answer. The dog may have been disintegrated to such dust that there was nothing to take back. And then an idiot might say, “well if the alien can do that to a dog, how can it not defend itself against a human and be taken out by a blow to the head. Well in fact Aliens have very sensitive bodies that are vulnerable to density of our planet. Their body’s are of such energetic constitution that physical contact to dense objects in our dimension can harm them greatly. But an idiot skeptic doesn’t research or know that. And if the alien head changed colors, that would actually be more in John’s favor than against his story. Because no puppet would change color from the woods to his home. Think about that. I mean really take a moment to let down your idiocracy and think about that. You try making a puppet that is gonna change colors. And only an idiot would change the puppet to a different color and than expect people to believe his story. Is John an idiot? I don’t know. But I know the majority of the people who weigh in on this subject are idiots, and so its almost a pointless conversation to have.

    • 7-10-2016

      Thank you for this well thought out reply. So many questions and very little answers.

      I hope someday, something will come to light, whether it is Rutter confessing to the hoax, or hell, even making me eat crow and some piece of evidence that gives this case credibility. I just don;t think you can get credibility out of a hoax.

Leave a Comment